Abstract / preview checked
Abstract and introduction in indexed publisher preview
Checked15 October 2026 · International operations research, 2005–2010
Thai/English summaries are project paraphrases, not official translations or endorsement of the original study.
Research question
Has OR/MS addressed previously identified disaster-management gaps?
Method and context
Classifies 155 papers and compares them with Altay and Green’s review.
Study summary
Assesses field development and recurring modelling assumptions.
Findings
Authors report no major change from the earlier review’s patterns.
Contribution
Adds assumption appraisal to research-gap assessment.
Interpretation limits
Use limitation: coverage ends in 2010, not the current field.
A question for further research
Our question: how do Thai allocation models handle delayed data and uncertain demand?
A starting point for a study design: extend the literature search, specify methods and outcomes, and assess ethics requirements for the data and participants.
Connect evidence to KSEC / OBE
Project-proposed critical-appraisal evidence, not research findings or accreditation criteria from the original authors.
- K
- Explain the question, concepts and findings with locators in the original.
- S
- Compare methods, variables and limitations with another study before designing a test or CPX.
- E
- Separate reported results from your proposals, cite originals and examine implications for vulnerable groups.
- C
- Record responses to critique and revisions after new evidence. Observe behaviour repeatedly, not from a single reading.
Related learning modules
Related knowledge domains
Original-study citation
Gina Galindo; Rajan Batta (2013). Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.039
Verify details against the original and format for your journal or institution. Titles and author names follow the source.