Full-text sections checked
Abstract, §3 Methodology and §5 Discussion via indexed publisher text
Checked15 October 2026 · Chiang Mai, Thailand
Thai/English summaries are project paraphrases, not official translations or endorsement of the original study.
Research question
How can road robustness be measured across flood levels?
Method and context
Four-stage framework using edge- and node-betweenness models.
Study summary
Connects water levels, damage footprints and network recovery thresholds.
Findings
Affected links, intersections and vehicles complement inundated-area indicators.
Contribution
Adds network indicators for comparing protection and restoration options.
Interpretation limits
Authors note disruption assessments depend on chosen recovery thresholds.
A question for further research
Our question: does including hospital access change road priorities?
A starting point for a study design: extend the literature search, specify methods and outcomes, and assess ethics requirements for the data and participants.
Connect evidence to KSEC / OBE
Project-proposed critical-appraisal evidence, not research findings or accreditation criteria from the original authors.
- K
- Explain the question, concepts and findings with locators in the original.
- S
- Compare methods, variables and limitations with another study before designing a test or CPX.
- E
- Separate reported results from your proposals, cite originals and examine implications for vulnerable groups.
- C
- Record responses to critique and revisions after new evidence. Observe behaviour repeatedly, not from a single reading.
Related learning modules
Related knowledge domains
Original-study citation
Suchat Tachaudomdach; Auttawit Upayokin; Nopadon Kronprasert; Kriangkrai Arunotayanun (2021). Quantifying Road-Network Robustness toward Flood-Resilient Transportation Systems. Sustainability, 13(6), 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063172
Verify details against the original and format for your journal or institution. Titles and author names follow the source.