Full-text sections checked
Publisher full text: Methods, Results/Tables 2–3, Lessons Learned, Limitations and Future Directions, Implications for Practice; ACEP PDF retained locally
Checked 16 October 2026 · Pediatric and public-health teams in four US states; February 2017
Thai/English summaries are project paraphrases, not official translations or endorsement of the original study.
Research question
What partnership and planning changes do participants report six months after a virtual TTX?
Method and context
Mixed methods with 26 participants/four teams; 18 immediate pre/post respondents and 14 matched respondents reporting state progress at months 1 and 6.
Study summary
Organizational follow-up through individual self-report, not observed team performance at six months.
Findings
Reported progress in partner awareness and similar exercises each rose from 4 to 7 of 14; four other action domains showed no significant change.
Contribution
Separates immediate intentions from later reported actions and identifies resource, turnover and priority barriers.
Interpretation limits
Small selected sample, attrition and potential social-desirability bias; no observed six-month team assessment, 12-month follow-up or actual-emergency outcome.
A question for further research
Project proposal: verify owned corrective actions and documentary evidence at months 6/12 separately from surveys, then observe public-health/EOC coordination for children in a fresh CPX.
A starting point for a study design: extend the literature search, specify methods and outcomes, and assess ethics requirements for the data and participants.
Explore the team assessment framework informed by this study
Proposed pilot, not an instrument endorsed by the original researchers
Connect evidence to KSEC / OBE
Project-proposed critical-appraisal evidence, not research findings or accreditation criteria from the original authors.
- K
- Explain the question, concepts and findings with locators in the original.
- S
- Compare methods, variables and limitations with another study before designing a test or CPX.
- E
- Separate reported results from your proposals, cite originals and examine implications for vulnerable groups.
- C
- Record responses to critique and revisions after new evidence. Observe behaviour repeatedly, not from a single reading.
Related learning modules
- Design a CPX from intended outcomes
- Simulation scenarios and 3D for learning
- From knowledge resources to OBE and KSEC assessment
Related knowledge domains
Original-study citation
Marvin So; Eric J. Dziuban; Jessica L. Franks; Karen Cobham-Owens; David J. Schonfeld; Aaron H. Gardner; Steven E. Krug; Georgina Peacock; Sarita Chung (2019). Extending the Reach of Pediatric Emergency Preparedness: A Virtual Tabletop Exercise Targeting Children’s Needs. Public Health Reports, 134(4), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919849880
Verify details against the original and format for your journal or institution. Titles and author names follow the source.